This report was buried by Anne McClellan, every man's nightmare.
The Joint Committee's SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONSBasically nothing came of all this work.
Anne McClellan, the man hater, killed this report.The Special Joint Committee on Child Custody and Access has sumarized its recommendations with references to the page in its report (found in brackets at the end of each recommendation) where each recommendation is discussed. We are reprinting the Summary below. Check out the committee's full report,
For the Sake of the Children to access a fully hyperlinked Table of Contents and to read the discussion leading to each recommendation.1. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to include
a Preamble alluding to the relevant principles of the United Nations Convention
on the Rights of the Child. (page 23) *
2. This Committee recognizes that parents' relationships with their
children do not end upon separation or divorce and therefore recommends
that the Divorce Act be amended to add a Preamble containing the principle
that divorced parents and their children are entitled to a close and continuous
relationship with one another. (page 23)
3. This Committee recommends that it is in the best interests of
children that
- they have the opportunity to be heard when parenting decisions affecting
them are being made;
- those whose parents divorce have the opportunity to express their
views to a skilled professional, whose duty it would be to make those views
known to any judge, assessor or mediator making or facilitating a shared
parenting determination;
- a court have the authority to appoint an interested third party,
such as a member of the child's extended family, to support and represent
a child experiencing difficulties during parental separation or divorce;
- the federal government work with the provinces and territories to
ensure that the necessary structures, procedures and resources are in place
to enable such consultation to take place, whether decisions are being
made under the Divorce Act or provincial legislation; and
- we recognize that children of divorce have a need and a right to
the protection of the courts, arising from their inherent jurisdiction.
(page 23)
4. This Committee recommends that where, in the opinion of the court,
the proper protection of the best interests of the child requires it, judges
have the power to appoint legal counsel for the child. Where such counsel
is appointed, it must be provided to the child. (page 23)
5. This Committee recommends that the terms ``custody and access''
no longer be used in the Divorce Act and instead that the meaning of both
terms be incorporated and received in the new term ``shared parenting",
which shall be taken to include all the meanings, rights, obligations,
and common-law and statutory interpretations embodied previously in the
terms ``custody and access". (page 27)
6. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to repeal
the definition of ``custody'' and to add a definition of ``shared parenting''
that reflects the meaning ascribed to that term by this Committee. (page
28)
7. This Committee recommends that the federal government work with
the provinces and territories toward a corresponding change in the terminology
in provincial/territorial family law. (page 28)
8. This Committee recommends that the common law ``tender years doctrine''
be rejected as a guide to decision making about parenting. (page 28)
9. This Committee recommends that both parents of a child receive
information and records in respect of the child's development and social
activities, such as school records, medical records and other relevant
information. The obligation to provide such information should extend to
schools, doctors, hospitals and others generating such information or records,
as well as to both parents, unless ordered otherwise by a court. (page
28)
10. This Committee recommends that all parents seeking parenting
orders, unless there is agreement between them on the terms of such an
order, be required to participate in an education program to help them
become aware of the post-separation reaction of parents and children, children's
developmental needs at different ages, the benefits of co-operative parenting
after divorce, parental rights and responsibilities, and the availability
and benefits of mediation and other forms of dispute resolution, provided
such programs are available. A certificate of attendance at such a post-separation
education program would be required before the parents would be able to
proceed with their application for a parenting order. Parents should not
be required to attend sessions together (page 30).
11. This Committee recommends that divorcing parents be encouraged
to develop, on their own or with the help of a trained mediator or through
some form of alternative dispute resolution, a parenting plan setting out
details about each parent's responsibilities for residence, care, decision
making and financial security for the children, together with the dispute
resolution process to be used by the parties. Parenting plans must also
require the sharing between parents of health, educational and other information
related to the child's development and social activities. All parenting
orders should be in the form of parenting plans. (page 32)
12. This Committee recommends that the relationships of grandparents,
siblings and other extended family members with children be recognized
as significant and that provisions for maintaining and fostering such relationships,
where they are in the best interests of those children, be included in
parenting plans. (page 32)
13. This Committee recommends that the Minister of Justice seek to
amend the Divorce Act to require that parties applying to a court for a
parenting order must file a proposed parenting plan with the court. (page
32)
14. This Committee recommends that divorcing parents be encouraged
to attend at least one mediation session to help them develop a parenting
plan for their children. Recognizing the impact of family violence on children,
mediation and other non-litigation methods of decision making should be
structured to screen for and identify family violence. Where there is a
proven history of violence by one parent toward the other or toward the
children, alternative forms of dispute resolution should be used to develop
parenting plans only when the safety of the person who has been the victim
of violence is assured and where the risk of violence has passed. The resulting
parenting plan must focus on parental responsibilities for the children
and contain measures to ensure safety and security for parents and children.
(page 33)
15. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to
provide that shared parenting determinations under sections 16 and 17 be
made on the basis of the "best interests of the child". (page
44)
16. The Committee recommends that decision makers, including parents
and judges, consider a list of criteria in determining the best interests
of the child, and that list shall include
16.1 The relative strength, nature and stability of the relationship
between the child and each person entitled to or claiming a parenting order
in relation to the child;
16.2 The relative strength, nature and stability of the relationship
between the child and other members of the child's family who reside with
the child, and persons involved in the care and upbringing of the child;
16.3 The views of the child, where such views can reasonably be ascertained;
16.4 The ability and willingness of each applicant to provide the
child with guidance and education, the necessaries of life and any special
needs of the child;
16.5 The child's cultural ties and religious affiliation;
16.6 The importance and benefit to the child of shared parenting,
ensuring both parents' active involvement in his or her life after separation;
16.7 The importance of relationships between the child and the child's
siblings, grandparents and other extended family members;
16.8 The parenting plans proposed by the parents;
16.9 The ability of the child to adjust to the proposed parenting
plans;
16.10 The willingness and ability of each of the parties to facilitate
and encourage a close and continuing relationship between the child and
the other parent;
16.11 Any proven history of family violence perpetrated by any party
applying for a parenting order;
16.12 There shall be no preference in favour of either parent solely
on the basis of that parent's gender;
16.13 The willingness shown by each parent to attend the required
education session; and
16.14 Any other factor considered by the court to be relevant to
a particular shared parenting dispute. (page 45)
17. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to
ensure that parties to proceedings under the Divorce Act can choose to
have such proceedings conducted in either of Canada's official languages.
(page 46)
18. Whereas the federal government is required by statute to review
the Federal Child Support Guidelines within five years of their implementation,
this Committee recommends that the Minister of Justice undertake as early
as possible a comprehensive review of the Guidelines to reflect gender
equality and the child's entitlement to financial support from both parents,
and to give particular attention to the following additional concerns raised
by this Committee:
18.1 Incorporation into the Child Support Guidelines of the new concepts
and language proposed by this Committee;
18.2 The impact of the current tax treatment of child support on
the adequacy of child support as it is awarded under the Guidelines and
on parents' ability to meet other financial obligations, such as to children
of second or subsequent relationships;
18.3 The desirability of considering both parents' income, or financial
capacity, in determining child support amounts, including the 40% rule
for determining whether the parenting arrangement is ``shared parenting'';
18.4 Recognition of the expenses incurred by support payors while
caring for their children;
18.5 Recognition of the additional expenses incurred by a parent
following a relocation of the other parent with the children;
18.6 Parental contributions to the financial support of adult children
attending post-secondary institutions;
18.7 The ability of parties to contract out of the Federal Child
Support Guidelines; and
18.8 The impact of the Guidelines on the income of parties receiving
public assistance. (page 51)
19. This Committee recommends that the federal government work with
the provinces and territories toward the development of a nation-wide co-ordinated
response to failures to respect parenting orders, involving both therapeutic
and punitive elements. Measures should include early intervention, parenting
education programs, a make-up time policy, counselling for families experiencing
parenting disputes, mediation and, for persistent intractable cases, punitive
solutions for parents who wrongfully disobey parenting orders. (page 55)
20. This Committee recommends that the federal government establish
a national computerized registry of shared parenting orders. (page 55)
21. This Committee recommends that the provincial and territorial
governments consider amending their family law to provide that maintaining
and fostering relationships with grandparents and other extended family
members is in the best interests of children and that such relationships
should not be disrupted without a significant reason related to the well-being
of the child. (page 57)
22. This Committee recommends that the federal government provide
leadership by ensuring that adequate resources are secured for the following
initiatives identified by this Committee as critical to the effort to develop
a more child-centred approach to family law policies and practices:
22.1 Expansion of unified family courts across Canada, including
the dedication of ample resources to interventions and programs aimed at
ensuring compliance with parenting orders, such as early intervention programs,
parenting education, make-up time policies, family and child counselling,
and mediation;
22.2 Civil legal aid to ensure that parties to contested parenting
applications are not prejudiced by the lack or inadequacy of legal representation;
22.3 A Children's Commissioner, an officer of Parliament reporting
to Parliament, who would superintend and promote the welfare and best interests
of children under the Divorce Act and in other areas of federal responsibility;
22.4 The provision of legal representation for children when appointed
by a judge;
22.5 Parenting education programs;
22.6 Supervised access programs; and
22.7 Enhanced opportunities for professional development for judges,
focused on the concept of shared parenting formulated by this Committee,
the impact of divorce on children, and the importance of maintaining relationships
between children and their parents and extended family members. (page 59)
23. This Committee recommends that the federal government continue
to work with the provinces and territories to accelerate the establishment
of unified family courts, or courts of a similar nature, in all judicial
districts across Canada. (page 63)
24. This Committee recommends that unified family courts, in addition
to their adjudicative function, include a broad range of non-litigation
support services, which might include
24.1 family and child counselling,
24.2 public legal education,
24.3 parenting assessment and mediation services,
24.4 an office responsible for hearing and supporting children who
are experiencing difficulties stemming from parental separation or divorce,
and
24.5 case management services, including monitoring the implementation
and enforcement of shared parenting orders. (page 64)
25. This Committee recommends that, as much as possible, provincial
and territorial governments, law societies and court administrators work
toward establishing a priority for shared parenting applications, above
other family law matters in dispute. (page 64)
26. This Committee recommends that in matters relating to parenting
under the Divorce Act, the importance of the presence of both parties at
any proceeding be recognized and emphasized, and that reliance on ex parte
proceedings be restricted as much as possible. (page 64)
27. This Committee recommends that court orders respecting shared
parenting be more detailed, readable and intelligible to police officers
called upon to enforce them. (page 67)
28. This Committee recommends that provincial and territorial governments
explore a variety of vehicles for increasing public awareness about the
impact of divorce on children and, in particular, the aspects of parental
conduct upon marriage breakdown that are most harmful to children, and
implement such education programs as fully as possible. To the extent practicable,
the Committee recommends that the federal government contribute to such
efforts within its own jurisdiction, including the provision of funding.
(page 68)
29. This Committee recommends that the federal government extend
financial support to programs run by community groups for couples wanting
to avoid separation and divorce or seeking to strengthen their marital
relationship. (page 68)
30. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to
require (a) that a parent wishing to relocate with a child, where the distance
would necessitate the modification of agreed or court-ordered parenting
arrangements, seek judicial permission at least 90 days before the proposed
move and (b) that the other parent be given notice at the same time. (page
70)
31. This Committee recommends that provinces and territories and
the relevant professional associations develop accreditation criteria for
family mediators and for social workers and psychologists involved in shared
parenting assessments. (page 72)
32. This Committee recommends that federal, provincial and territorial
governments work together to encourage the development of effective models
for the early identification of high-conflict families seeking divorce.
Such families should be streamed into a specialized, expedited process
and offered services designed to improve outcomes for their children. (page
74)
33. This Committee recommends that professionals who meet with children
experiencing parental separation recognize that a child's wish not to have
contact with a parent could reveal a significant problem and should result
in the immediate referral of the family for therapeutic intervention. (page
74)
34. This Committee recommends that the federal, provincial and territorial
governments work together to ensure the availability of supervised parenting
programs to serve Canadians in every part of Canada. (page 76)
35. This Committee recommends that the Divorce Act be amended to
make explicit provision for the granting of supervised parenting orders
where necessary to ensure continuing contact between a parent and a child
in situations of transition, or where there is clear evidence that the
child requires protection. (page 76)
36. This Committee recommends that the provincial and territorial
governments require child protection agencies to provide disclosure of
records of investigations to court-appointed assessors examining families
who have been the subject of such investigations. (page 77)
37. This Committee recommends that the attorneys general of Canada
and the provinces, along with police forces and police organizations, ensure
that all warrants in child abduction matters provide expressly that their
application and enforcement are national. (page 84)
38. This Committee recommends that the Attorney General of Canada
work to develop a co-ordinated national response to the problem of child
abduction within Canada. (page 84)
39. This Committee recommends that the unilateral removal of a child
from the family home without suitable arrangements for contact between
the child and the other parent be recognized as contrary to the best interests
of the child, except in an emergency. (page 84)
40. This Committee recommends that a parent who has unilaterally
removed a child not be permitted to rely on the resulting period of sole
care and control of the child, of whatever duration, as the basis for a
sole parenting order. (page 84)
41. This Committee recommends that the federal government implement
the recommendations of the Sub-Committee on Human Rights and International
Development of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs
and International Trade entitled International Child Abduction: Issues
for Reform. (page 84)
42. This Committee recommends that the Minister of Foreign Affairs
and the Passport Office continue to examine ways to improve the identification
of minor children in travel documents and consider further the advisability
of requiring that all children be issued individual passports. (page 84)
43. This Committee recommends that, to deal with intentional false
accusations of abuse or neglect, the federal government assess the adequacy
of the Criminal Code in dealing with false statements in family law matters
and develop policies to promote action on clear cases of mischief, obstruction
of justice or perjury. (page 90)
44. This Committee recommends that the federal government work with
the provinces and territories to encourage child welfare agencies to track
investigations of allegations of abuse made in the context of parenting
disputes, in order to provide a statistical basis for a better understanding
of this problem. (page 93)
45. This Committee recommends that the federal government engage
in further consultation with Aboriginal organizations and communities across
Canada about issues related to shared parenting that are particular to
those communities, with a view to developing a clear plan of action to
be implemented in a timely way. (page 97)
46. This Committee recommends that the federal government include
as the basis for such consultations the family law-related recommendations
of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples and work toward their implementation
as appropriate. (page 98)
47. This Committee recommends that sexual orientation not be considered
a negative factor in the disposition of shared parenting decisions. (page
99)
48. This Committee recommends that the Minister of Foreign Affairs
work toward the signing and ratification as soon as possible of the 1996
Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Law Applicable, Recognition, Enforcement
and Cooperation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for
the Protection of Children. (page 101)
* Page numbers in parentheses indicate the location
of the recommendation in the text of the Committee's report.
|